# CoreWeave vs Hyperstack

Canonical: https://inetgeek.com/compare/coreweave-vs-hyperstack/

Every value below is read from CoreWeave's and Hyperstack's own documentation. See https://inetgeek.com/methodology/ for how.

## At a glance

| Criterion | CoreWeave | Hyperstack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Egress over allowance | Free. CoreWeave charges nothing for egress or for I/O operations, and runs a zero-egress migration programme for moving data in. | Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour. |
| H100 SXM, per GPU-hour | $6.16 per GPU-hour for H100 SXM 80GB. CoreWeave sells the 8-GPU HGX H100 node at $49.24/hour on demand — the per-GPU figure is that divided by eight, ours rather than CoreWeave's, and you cannot rent one card. | $3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50. |
| Cheapest GPU, per hour | $1.25 per GPU-hour for L40, again as an 8-GPU node at $10.00/hour. A100 80GB nodes are $21.60/hour, or $2.70 per GPU. | $0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60. |
| Largest GPU offered | 288GB per GPU on B300-class hardware; the largest listed on-demand node is HGX B200 at 180GB per GPU, eight GPUs, $68.80/hour. | 288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00. |
| Reserved pricing | Up to 60% below on-demand for reserved compute capacity. | Published reserved rates rather than a percentage: H200 SXM falls from $3.99 on demand to $2.79 reserved, about 30% below. |

## Where they differ

### Egress over allowance

- CoreWeave: Free. CoreWeave charges nothing for egress or for I/O operations, and runs a zero-egress migration programme for moving data in. ([source](https://www.coreweave.com/pricing))
- Hyperstack: Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour. ([source](https://www.hyperstack.cloud/gpu-pricing))

### H100 SXM, per GPU-hour

- CoreWeave: $6.16 per GPU-hour for H100 SXM 80GB. CoreWeave sells the 8-GPU HGX H100 node at $49.24/hour on demand — the per-GPU figure is that divided by eight, ours rather than CoreWeave's, and you cannot rent one card. ([source](https://www.coreweave.com/pricing))
- Hyperstack: $3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50. ([source](https://www.hyperstack.cloud/gpu-pricing))

### Cheapest GPU, per hour

- CoreWeave: $1.25 per GPU-hour for L40, again as an 8-GPU node at $10.00/hour. A100 80GB nodes are $21.60/hour, or $2.70 per GPU. ([source](https://www.coreweave.com/pricing))
- Hyperstack: $0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60. ([source](https://www.hyperstack.cloud/gpu-pricing))

### Largest GPU offered

- CoreWeave: 288GB per GPU on B300-class hardware; the largest listed on-demand node is HGX B200 at 180GB per GPU, eight GPUs, $68.80/hour. ([source](https://www.coreweave.com/pricing))
- Hyperstack: 288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00. ([source](https://www.hyperstack.cloud/gpu-pricing))

### Reserved pricing

- CoreWeave: Up to 60% below on-demand for reserved compute capacity. ([source](https://www.coreweave.com/pricing))
- Hyperstack: Published reserved rates rather than a percentage: H200 SXM falls from $3.99 on demand to $2.79 reserved, about 30% below. ([source](https://www.hyperstack.cloud/gpu-pricing))

## Which should you choose?

Pick CoreWeave if Training runs that want a whole HGX node and move large datasets — free egress and free I/O operations remove the charge that usually dominates a data-heavy job.

Pick Hyperstack if Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.

Consider something else: CoreWeave — You cannot rent a single card: the H100 is sold as an eight-GPU node at $49.24 an hour, so a one-GPU experiment costs eight GPUs.

Consider something else: Hyperstack — Billing is per minute rather than per second, so very short jobs round up in a way they do not at RunPod.

## Documented by only one

- Storage price: CoreWeave: $0.06 per GB per month for hot AI object storage, and $0.070 per GB per month for the tier listed beside it.
- Billing granularity: Hyperstack: Per minute, with enterprise-scale contracts negotiated separately.

## Questions this comparison answers

**Egress over allowance: CoreWeave or Hyperstack?**

CoreWeave: Free. CoreWeave charges nothing for egress or for I/O operations, and runs a zero-egress migration programme for moving data in.
Hyperstack: Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour.

**Should I choose CoreWeave or Hyperstack?**

Pick CoreWeave if Training runs that want a whole HGX node and move large datasets — free egress and free I/O operations remove the charge that usually dominates a data-heavy job.
Pick Hyperstack if Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.