Skip to content
inetGeek

Neo4j vs Nile

SEPT 2026 audit

A comparison of Neo4j and Nile built from values read directly from each provider's own documentation, with the source recorded against every figure.

Updated 13 criteria comparedSources last checked

The short answer

Choose Neo4j if…

Teams whose data is naturally relationships-first — recommendation engines, fraud detection, knowledge graphs — where the query itself is a graph traversal Cypher expresses directly and a relational join chain would not.

Editorial · Palash Bagchi · approved

Choose Nile if…

Multi-tenant SaaS where every customer wants isolation — Nile makes a database per tenant the default shape rather than something you build on top of Postgres.

Editorial · Palash Bagchi · approved

Consider something else if…

  • Neo4j: The data model is tabular and the graph shape is incidental — most CRUD apps fit a relational or document database better, and Neo4j's per-GB memory pricing is a worse fit for large flat datasets than a row-store.
  • Nile: Several of the features on its own pricing table are marked Coming soon, including branching, backups and provisioned compute, so what is bought today is narrower than the table suggests.

3 sourced criteria separate them — see where, with sources, below.

No affiliate links, sponsored placements or paid rankings appear on this site. Ordering follows the sourced data and the stated criteria.

01.

At a glance.

CriterionNeo4jNile
Pricing
Entry paid plan$65/GB/month (minimum 1GB cluster) on AuraDB Professional, or $0.09/hour ($65.70/month for 1GB) metered hourly. 14-day free trial available.$15/month for Pro, which carries a production SLA. Scale is $350/month.
Pricing modelUsage-based, metered per GB-hour of memory on the Professional tier. A paused database cuts cost by roughly 80%.Priced on queries rather than instances, with a $15 base for Pro. Nile's own framing is "Pay for queries, not for instances", and additional tokens are $0.05 per million.
Data
EngineNeo4j, a native property graph database.PostgreSQL, with tenant isolation as a first-class concept — databases, tenant databases and vector embeddings are all described as unlimited.

Only criteria both providers publish appear here; a tinted cell marks a real difference. Criteria only one of them documents are listed below, and an absence there means we found no source — not that the feature is missing. How we source this.

The small bar above a value is inetGeek's own lean toward that side — computed from the same facts shown, never a number the provider published. See the picker below "The short answer" to weigh only the criteria you care about.

02.

Where they differ.

Entry paid plan

Neo4j
$65/GB/month (minimum 1GB cluster) on AuraDB Professional, or $0.09/hour ($65.70/month for 1GB) metered hourly. 14-day free trial available.
Nile
$15/month for Pro, which carries a production SLA. Scale is $350/month.
Sources (2) →
  • Neo4j Pricing ↗

    “$65/GB/month, minimum 1GB cluster. 14-day free trial available. 1GB costs $0.09/hour or $65.70/month.”

    Read 2026-09-11 · official pricing

  • Pricing — Nile ↗

    “Pro For launching production workloads. With production SLA $ 15 / month [...] Scale For scale, more security and global presence $ 350 / month”

    Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing

Pricing model

Neo4j
Usage-based, metered per GB-hour of memory on the Professional tier. A paused database cuts cost by roughly 80%.
Nile
Priced on queries rather than instances, with a $15 base for Pro. Nile's own framing is "Pay for queries, not for instances", and additional tokens are $0.05 per million.
Sources (2) →
  • Neo4j Pricing ↗

    “Pause database, save 80% costs.”

    Read 2026-09-11 · official pricing

  • Pricing — Nile ↗

    “Pay for queries Not for instances [...] 0.05 per million additional tokens Storage 5 GB $1.00 per additional GB”

    Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing

Engine

Neo4j
Neo4j, a native property graph database.
Nile
PostgreSQL, with tenant isolation as a first-class concept — databases, tenant databases and vector embeddings are all described as unlimited.
Sources (2) →
  • Neo4j Aura documentation ↗

    “Neo4j Aura is a fully automated graph platform offered as a cloud service.”

    Read 2026-09-11 · official docs

  • Pricing — Nile ↗

    “multi-tenant applications with Nile's Postgres Unlimited Databases Unlimited Tenants Pay for queries Not for instances Limitless vector embeddings”

    Read 2026-09-06 · official site

When these numbers change, hear about it. Sources are re-checked monthly; a repricing goes out as a short note.

Confirm by email; unsubscribe from any issue. Your address goes to Kit and nowhere else — what we do with it.

03.

Documented by only one.

These criteria are published by one provider and not the other. An absence here means we have not found a source, not that the feature is missing.

Free tierNeo4j: Yes
Startup credit programNeo4j: Neo4j for Startups: up to $16K in Aura credits. Requires Series B or earlier funding, a single product sold to many customers (not custom per-customer work), a functioning website, and a company LinkedIn profile.
Storage (entry plan)Nile: 5 GB on Pro, then $1.00 per additional GB.
Managed connection poolingNile: Supported
RegionsNeo4j: AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, across more than 60 global cloud regions; also available through the AWS, Azure and Google Cloud marketplaces.
Connection limitNile: 10,000 connections on Pro, with connection pooling included.
When idleNile: No cold start on Pro — Nile lists it as a plan feature rather than a behaviour to configure.
Point-in-time recoveryNeo4j: Not included on the entry-paid (Professional) tier — point-in-time restore is a Business Critical feature, with hourly granularity and 30-day retention.
Read replicasNeo4j: Supported
Backup retentionNeo4j: Daily backups, 7-day retention on the entry-paid (Professional) tier. Business Critical adds 30-day retention with hourly point-in-time restore; Virtual Dedicated Cloud gets hourly backups with 60-day retention.
04.

Questions this comparison answers.

Entry paid plan: Neo4j or Nile?

Neo4j: $65/GB/month (minimum 1GB cluster) on AuraDB Professional, or $0.09/hour ($65.70/month for 1GB) metered hourly. 14-day free trial available.

Nile: $15/month for Pro, which carries a production SLA. Scale is $350/month.

Should I choose Neo4j or Nile?

Pick Neo4j if Teams whose data is naturally relationships-first — recommendation engines, fraud detection, knowledge graphs — where the query itself is a graph traversal Cypher expresses directly and a relational join chain would not.

Pick Nile if Multi-tenant SaaS where every customer wants isolation — Nile makes a database per tenant the default shape rather than something you build on top of Postgres.

Provider pages

Related comparisons

Every page here is sourced and dated.