Skip to content
inetGeek

GitHub Actions alternatives

CI/CD · 2 alternatives · GitHub Actions iScore 74 (#2/3)

Every CI/CD provider this site tracks, ordered by iScore — the same peers GitHub Actions's own score is measured against. The line under each name is where its sourced facts differ from GitHub Actions's; where a full comparison exists, the row links to it.

Ranked by iScore
  1. CircleCIEntry paid plan: Performance plan: starting at $15/month, including 30,000 free credits plus additional pa…74#1/3
  2. BuildkiteEntry paid plan: Pro plan: $30 per active user/month.73#3/3

Where GitHub Actions stands against these 2

GitHub Actions's own sourced figures, placed among the alternatives above that document the same thing in the same unit. A rank here is one criterion, not a verdict; the iScore above weighs all of them.

Free tier
Yes. 2 of the 2 alternatives that document it have one: Buildkite, CircleCI.
Concurrent builds
Total concurrent jobs on standard GitHub-hosted runners: 20 on Free, 40 Pro, 60 Team, 500 Enterprise; 1,000…2nd highest of the 3 that document it. Highest: CircleCI — 30 concurrent job runs on Free, 80 on Performance, unlimited on Scale; macOS VM concurrency is 1 / 15 / custom.
Max job duration
Up to 6 hours of execution time per job on GitHub-hosted runnersHighest of the 3 that document it. Next: Buildkite — 4 hours on the Free plan; unlimited on the Pro and Enterprise plans.

No affiliate links, sponsored placements or paid rankings appear on this site. Ordering follows the sourced data and the stated criteria.

A rank whose 80% interval overlaps its neighbour's is an ordering, not a finding; the intervals are on each provider's page and in /scores.json.

When these numbers change, hear about it. Sources are re-checked monthly; a repricing goes out as a short note.

Confirm by email; unsubscribe from any issue. Your address goes to Kit and nowhere else — what we do with it.

Every page here is sourced and dated.