Piqo alternatives
Every web analytics provider this site tracks, ordered by iScore — the same peers Piqo's own score is measured against. The line under each name is where its sourced facts differ from Piqo's; where a full comparison exists, the row links to it.
- TraksFree tier: Yes vs No · Kind of free offer: Always free vs Free trial
- UmamiFree tier: Yes vs No · Kind of free offer: Free tier vs Free trial
- GoatCounterFree tier: Yes vs No
- Simple AnalyticsFree tier: Yes vs No
- Pirsch AnalyticsRevenue attribution from a payment provider: Limited vs Supported
- DataFastvs PiqoWhat the free plan includes: Nothing standing — the only free access is a 14-day trial with no card. The entry Starter…
- Cool Analyticsvs PiqoCredit card to start: Yes vs No
- Plausible AnalyticsRevenue attribution from a payment provider: Limited vs Supported
- Fathom AnalyticsRevenue attribution from a payment provider: Limited vs Supported
- DataBullvs PiqoKind of free offer: No free offer vs Free trial
Where Piqo stands against these 10
Piqo's own sourced figures, placed among the alternatives above that document the same thing in the same unit. A rank here is one criterion, not a verdict; the iScore above weighs all of them.
- Free tier
- No. 4 of the 10 alternatives that document it have one: GoatCounter, Simple Analytics, Traks, Umami.
- Sites or apps included
- Up to 20 websites on every plan; the monthly events are shared across themJoint 3rd highest of the 6 that document it. Highest: Fathom Analytics — 50 sites on every plan, including the $15 entry band — the count does not rise with the price, only the…
- Retention window
- Three years of event history on every planJoint highest of the 4 that document it. Level with: DataFast — Three years of data retention on Starter, the entry tier; five or more on Growth.
A rank whose 80% interval overlaps its neighbour's is an ordering, not a finding; the intervals are on each provider's page and in /scores.json.