CoreWeave vs Hyperstack
A comparison of CoreWeave and Hyperstack built from values read directly from each provider's own documentation, with the source recorded against every figure.
The short answer
- Pick CoreWeave if
- Training runs that want a whole HGX node and move large datasets — free egress and free I/O operations remove the charge that usually dominates a data-heavy job.
- Pick Hyperstack if
- Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.
5 sourced criteria separate them:
- Egress over allowance
- CoreWeave: Free. CoreWeave charges nothing for egress or for I/O operations, and runs a zero-egress migration programme for moving data in.
- Hyperstack: Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour.
- H100 SXM, per GPU-hour
- CoreWeave: $6.16 per GPU-hour for H100 SXM 80GB. CoreWeave sells the 8-GPU HGX H100 node at $49.24/hour on demand — the per-GPU figure is that divided by eight, ours rather than CoreWeave's, and you cannot rent one card.
- Hyperstack: $3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50.
- Cheapest GPU, per hour
- CoreWeave: $1.25 per GPU-hour for L40, again as an 8-GPU node at $10.00/hour. A100 80GB nodes are $21.60/hour, or $2.70 per GPU.
- Hyperstack: $0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60.
- Largest GPU offered
- CoreWeave: 288GB per GPU on B300-class hardware; the largest listed on-demand node is HGX B200 at 180GB per GPU, eight GPUs, $68.80/hour.
- Hyperstack: 288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00.
- Reserved pricing
- CoreWeave: Up to 60% below on-demand for reserved compute capacity.
- Hyperstack: Published reserved rates rather than a percentage: H200 SXM falls from $3.99 on demand to $2.79 reserved, about 30% below.
Pick the criteria you care about. The chart counts how many of them lean toward each provider — the same read as scanning the bars below, just totalled for the ones you chose.
CoreWeave 0
Hyperstack 0
At a glance.
| Criterion | CoreWeave | Hyperstack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Egress over allowance | Free. CoreWeave charges nothing for egress or for I/O operations, and runs a zero-egress migration programme for moving data in. | Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour. |
| GPU | ||
| H100 SXM, per GPU-hour | $6.16 per GPU-hour for H100 SXM 80GB. CoreWeave sells the 8-GPU HGX H100 node at $49.24/hour on demand — the per-GPU figure is that divided by eight, ours rather than CoreWeave's, and you cannot rent one card. | $3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50. |
| Cheapest GPU, per hour | $1.25 per GPU-hour for L40, again as an 8-GPU node at $10.00/hour. A100 80GB nodes are $21.60/hour, or $2.70 per GPU. | $0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60. |
| Largest GPU offered | 288GB per GPU on B300-class hardware; the largest listed on-demand node is HGX B200 at 180GB per GPU, eight GPUs, $68.80/hour. | 288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00. |
| Reserved pricing | Up to 60% below on-demand for reserved compute capacity. | Published reserved rates rather than a percentage: H200 SXM falls from $3.99 on demand to $2.79 reserved, about 30% below. |
Where they differ.
Egress over allowance
- CoreWeave
- Free. CoreWeave charges nothing for egress or for I/O operations, and runs a zero-egress migration programme for moving data in.
- Hyperstack
- Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour.
Sources (2) →Sources ↓
- Pricing — CoreWeave ↗
“Egress and Input Output Operations per Second - Free [...] CoreWeave Zero Egress Migration ( 0 EM) Zero egress data migration to CoreWeave”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
- GPU Pricing — Hyperstack ↗
“Public IP address 0.00672043 per hour Egress/Ingress traffic Free On-Demand Kubernetes Free master node”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
H100 SXM, per GPU-hour
- CoreWeave
- $6.16 per GPU-hour for H100 SXM 80GB. CoreWeave sells the 8-GPU HGX H100 node at $49.24/hour on demand — the per-GPU figure is that divided by eight, ours rather than CoreWeave's, and you cannot rent one card.
- Hyperstack
- $3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50.
Sources (2) →Sources ↓
- Pricing — CoreWeave ↗
“NVIDIA HGX H100 8 80 128 2,048 61.44 $49.24 NVIDIA HGX H100 On-Demand”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
- GPU Pricing — Hyperstack ↗
“NVIDIA H100 SXM 80 24 240 $3.20 NVIDIA H100 NVLink 80 31 180 $2.60 NVIDIA H100 80 28 180 $2.50”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
Cheapest GPU, per hour
- CoreWeave
- $1.25 per GPU-hour for L40, again as an 8-GPU node at $10.00/hour. A100 80GB nodes are $21.60/hour, or $2.70 per GPU.
- Hyperstack
- $0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60.
Sources (2) →Sources ↓
- Pricing — CoreWeave ↗
“NVIDIA L40 8 48 128 1,024 7.68 $10.00 [...] NVIDIA A100 8 80 128 2,048 7.68 $21.60”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
- GPU Pricing — Hyperstack ↗
“NVIDIA A4000 16 6 24 $0.15 [...] NVIDIA A100 SXM 80 24 120 $1.60”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
Largest GPU offered
288GB per GPU on B300-class hardware; the largest listed on-demand node is HGX B200 at 180GB per GPU, eight GPUs, $68.80/hour.
288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00.
Sources (2) →Sources ↓
- Pricing — CoreWeave ↗
“NVIDIA HGX B200 8 180 128 2,048 61.44 $68.80”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
- GPU Pricing — Hyperstack ↗
“NVIDIA B200 192 31 256 $6.00 NVIDIA B300 288 28 240 $7.40”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
Reserved pricing
- CoreWeave
- Up to 60% below on-demand for reserved compute capacity.
- Hyperstack
- Published reserved rates rather than a percentage: H200 SXM falls from $3.99 on demand to $2.79 reserved, about 30% below.
Sources (2) →Sources ↓
- Pricing — CoreWeave ↗
“Reserved Compute Capacity CoreWeave offers up to 60% discounts over”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
- GPU Pricing — Hyperstack ↗
“Reservation Pricing GPU Model Starting from Reserve NVIDIA H200 SXM $2.79 Reserve here”
Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing
When these numbers change, hear about it. Sources are re-checked monthly; a repricing goes out as a short note.
Which should you choose?
Choose CoreWeave if…
Training runs that want a whole HGX node and move large datasets — free egress and free I/O operations remove the charge that usually dominates a data-heavy job.
Editorial · Palash Bagchi · approved
Choose Hyperstack if…
Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.
Editorial · Palash Bagchi · approved
Consider something else if…
- CoreWeave: You cannot rent a single card: the H100 is sold as an eight-GPU node at $49.24 an hour, so a one-GPU experiment costs eight GPUs.
- Hyperstack: Billing is per minute rather than per second, so very short jobs round up in a way they do not at RunPod.
Documented by only one.
These criteria are published by one provider and not the other. An absence here means we have not found a source, not that the feature is missing.
Questions this comparison answers.
Egress over allowance: CoreWeave or Hyperstack?
CoreWeave: Free. CoreWeave charges nothing for egress or for I/O operations, and runs a zero-egress migration programme for moving data in.
Hyperstack: Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour.
Should I choose CoreWeave or Hyperstack?
Pick CoreWeave if Training runs that want a whole HGX node and move large datasets — free egress and free I/O operations remove the charge that usually dominates a data-heavy job.
Pick Hyperstack if Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.