Skip to content
inetGeek

Vast.ai vs Hyperstack

A comparison of Vast.ai and Hyperstack built from values read directly from each provider's own documentation, with the source recorded against every figure.

Updated 7 criteria comparedSources last checked

The short answer

Pick Vast.ai if
Price-sensitive training and batch inference that can tolerate a marketplace — the median H100 rate is well under half what the managed clouds charge, and interruptible capacity goes lower still.
Pick Hyperstack if
Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.

3 sourced criteria separate them:

H100 SXM, per GPU-hour
Vast.ai: Median $2.16 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB, with a floor of $1.33 from the cheapest host. Vast is a marketplace — the floor is one host's offer at one moment and the median is what the market is actually charging, so both move without anyone announcing anything. This figure is a snapshot, not a rate card.
Hyperstack: $3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50.
Cheapest GPU, per hour
Vast.ai: Floor and median vary by card and by the hour; H100 PCIe runs from $1.87 with a median of $2.67, and H200 from $1.97 with a median of $4.24. The H200 floor now sits below the H100 PCIe median, which is the kind of inversion a marketplace produces and a rate card cannot.
Hyperstack: $0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60.
Largest GPU offered
Vast.ai: 192GB per GPU on B200, from $4.38 an hour with a median of $7.50.
Hyperstack: 288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00.

No affiliate links, sponsored placements or paid rankings appear on this site. Ordering follows the sourced data and the stated criteria.

01.

At a glance.

CriterionVast.aiHyperstack
GPU
H100 SXM, per GPU-hour
Median $2.16 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB, with a floor of $1.33 from the cheapest host. Vast is a marketplace — the floor is one host's offer at one moment and the median is what the market is actually charging, so both move without anyone announcing anything. This figure is a snapshot, not a rate card.
$3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50.
Cheapest GPU, per hourFloor and median vary by card and by the hour; H100 PCIe runs from $1.87 with a median of $2.67, and H200 from $1.97 with a median of $4.24. The H200 floor now sits below the H100 PCIe median, which is the kind of inversion a marketplace produces and a rate card cannot.$0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60.
Largest GPU offered
192GB per GPU on B200, from $4.38 an hour with a median of $7.50.
288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00.

Only criteria both providers publish appear here; a tinted cell marks a real difference. Criteria only one of them documents are listed below, and an absence there means we found no source — not that the feature is missing. How we source this.

The small bar above a value is inetGeek's own lean toward that side — computed from the same facts shown, never a number the provider published. See the picker below "The short answer" to weigh only the criteria you care about.

02.

Where they differ.

H100 SXM, per GPU-hour

Vast.ai
Median $2.16 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB, with a floor of $1.33 from the cheapest host. Vast is a marketplace — the floor is one host's offer at one moment and the median is what the market is actually charging, so both move without anyone announcing anything. This figure is a snapshot, not a rate card.
Hyperstack
$3.20 per hour for H100 SXM 80GB on demand. The NVLink variant is $2.60 and the PCIe H100 is $2.50.
Sources (2) →
  • Pricing — Vast.ai ↗

    “H100 SXM Hopper 80GB VRAM from $1.33 /hr median $2.16/hr”

    Read 2026-09-08 · official pricing

  • GPU Pricing — Hyperstack ↗

    “NVIDIA H100 SXM 80 24 240 $3.20 NVIDIA H100 NVLink 80 31 180 $2.60 NVIDIA H100 80 28 180 $2.50”

    Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing

Cheapest GPU, per hour

Vast.ai
Floor and median vary by card and by the hour; H100 PCIe runs from $1.87 with a median of $2.67, and H200 from $1.97 with a median of $4.24. The H200 floor now sits below the H100 PCIe median, which is the kind of inversion a marketplace produces and a rate card cannot.
Hyperstack
$0.15 per hour for an A4000 with 16GB; the A100 SXM 80GB is $1.60.
Sources (2) →
  • Pricing — Vast.ai ↗

    “H100 PCIE Hopper 80GB VRAM from $1.87 /hr median $2.67/hr [...] H200 Hopper 141GB VRAM from $1.97 /hr median $4.24/hr”

    Read 2026-09-08 · official pricing

  • GPU Pricing — Hyperstack ↗

    “NVIDIA A4000 16 6 24 $0.15 [...] NVIDIA A100 SXM 80 24 120 $1.60”

    Read 2026-09-06 · official pricing

Largest GPU offered

Vast.ai

192GB per GPU on B200, from $4.38 an hour with a median of $7.50.

Hyperstack

288GB per GPU on B300 at $7.40 an hour; B200 at 192GB is $6.00.

Sources (2) →

When these numbers change, hear about it. Sources are re-checked monthly; a repricing goes out as a short note.

Confirm by email; unsubscribe from any issue. Your address goes to Kit and nowhere else — what we do with it.

03.

Which should you choose?

Choose Vast.ai if…

Price-sensitive training and batch inference that can tolerate a marketplace — the median H100 rate is well under half what the managed clouds charge, and interruptible capacity goes lower still.

Editorial · Palash Bagchi · approved

Choose Hyperstack if…

Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.

Editorial · Palash Bagchi · approved

Consider something else if…

  • Vast.ai: There is no single price to plan against: rates move with supply, the host is not Vast itself, and an interruptible instance can be reclaimed mid-run.
  • Hyperstack: Billing is per minute rather than per second, so very short jobs round up in a way they do not at RunPod.
04.

Documented by only one.

These criteria are published by one provider and not the other. An absence here means we have not found a source, not that the feature is missing.

Pricing modelVast.ai: A marketplace rather than a cloud: prices are set by supply and demand across more than 40 data centres, and the same card can be rented on demand, interruptibly, or reserved. Rates move continuously, which is why every figure here carries a 7-day re-verification window rather than the category's 30.
Egress over allowanceHyperstack: Free. Egress and ingress traffic are not charged; a public IP address costs $0.00672043 per hour.
Billing granularityHyperstack: Per minute, with enterprise-scale contracts negotiated separately.
Reserved pricingHyperstack: Published reserved rates rather than a percentage: H200 SXM falls from $3.99 on demand to $2.79 reserved, about 30% below.
05.

Questions this comparison answers.

Should I choose Vast.ai or Hyperstack?

Pick Vast.ai if Price-sensitive training and batch inference that can tolerate a marketplace — the median H100 rate is well under half what the managed clouds charge, and interruptible capacity goes lower still.

Pick Hyperstack if Steady European workloads that can commit — reserved H200 at $2.79 against $3.99 on demand is the clearest published discount in this set, and egress is free.

Every page here is sourced and dated.