Alternatives to Supabase

Every managed databases provider this site tracks, ordered by iScore — the same peers Supabase's own score is measured against. The line under each name is where its sourced facts differ from Supabase's; where a full comparison exists, the row links to it.

1. Amazon Auroravs SupabaseKind of free offer: Introductory free tier vs Free tier71#2/13→
2. Neonvs SupabaseEntry paid plan: No fixed monthly fee. Launch is usage-based — Neon's own worked example puts typical spen…70#3/13→
3. Tursovs SupabaseEntry paid plan: $4.99/month for Developer, the cheapest paid plan. Scaler is $24.92 and Pro $416.58.70#4/13→
4. TigerDatavs SupabaseEntry paid plan: Compute starts at $30/month on Performance, billed hourly, with storage charged separatel…70#5/13→
5. Aivenvs SupabaseKind of free offer: Always free vs Free tier70#6/13→
6. Prisma Postgresvs SupabaseKind of free offer: Always free vs Free tier · Engine: PostgreSQL. vs PostgreSQL69#7/13→
7. Amazon RDSvs SupabaseKind of free offer: Introductory free tier vs Free tier68#8/13→
8. Nilevs SupabaseEntry paid plan: $15/month for Pro, which carries a production SLA. Scale is $350/month.68#9/13→
9. ScaleGridvs SupabaseFree tier: No vs Yes · Kind of free offer: Free trial vs Free tier68#10/13→
10. Crunchy Bridgevs SupabaseEntry paid plan: $9 a month for Hobby-0 — 2 cores, 512 MB, AWS only. Crunchy says the Hobby tier runs on l…68#11/13→
11. PlanetScalevs SupabaseEntry paid plan: $5/month for a single-node Postgres database on network-attached storage; PlanetScale Met…68#12/13→
12. Neo4jvs SupabaseEntry paid plan: $65/GB/month (minimum 1GB cluster) on AuraDB Professional, or $0.09/hour ($65.70/month fo…66#13/13→

No affiliate links, sponsored placements or paid rankings appear on this site. Ordering follows the sourced data and the stated criteria.

A rank whose 80% interval overlaps its neighbour's is an ordering, not a finding; the intervals are on each provider's page and in /scores.json.